social.coop is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Fediverse instance for people interested in cooperative and collective projects. If you are interested in joining our community, please apply at https://join.social.coop/registration-form.html.

Administered by:

Server stats:

502
active users

Sumana Harihareswara

My new post Includes:

* Air quality & ventilation: Specifics on the Aranet 4 carbon dioxide monitor, including a coupon.

* Masking: Some N95, N99, & P100 respirators you may not have heard of, with links to purchase. And: when/where I'm willing to wear a valved mask.

* Self-testing (antigen + NAAT/molecular): Links to some amazing sale prices on rapid tests, including more-accurate molecular tests.

Plus a nasal spray and a new wastewater data site.

harihareswara.net/posts/2023/m

@brainwane love this blog post, it’s so sensible and so well presented.

Detail question: did you find a transparent mask with actual legit filtration? I spent a while researching them and they all had sketchy or no claims about effectiveness as a mask; wish I knew a good one!

@0x09 @brainwane Thank you for this excellent post, Sumana! So many links to explore!.

I have the same question as Tabby. I read over the Jelli test results linked from their FAQ, but I don't know that I know enough to be positive that this is enough filtration for me to use in teaching, which I would love to do to benefit students who read lips.

@hydropsyche @0x09 Great question! And, looking back at my notes, I need to revise and downgrade my recommendation of the Jelli M1 as it's more akin to a surgical mask.

Jelli links to assessment results at docsend.com/view/2zwv367nrufpe and I asked an expert friend to review them. She said:

"... the filtration went down by one third after exposure to humidity.
This seems like a lot but those results might be in line with other masks, I'm not sure."

[1/3]

DocSendDocSend - Simple, intelligent, modern content sendingDocSend helps you communicate more effectively by telling you what happens to content after you send them and letting you keep control in real time.

@hydropsyche @0x09

@hydropsyche @0x09

"They seem to be testing to the surgical mask standard as opposed to the n95 standard which isn't really a problem (since that's also what they say in their faq) they're just setting a low bar for themselves bc you only need 80% efficiency not 95% & you don't have to test for leakage."

[2/3]

@hydropsyche @0x09

"No real red flags that I can see from the report so that's good. The only thing I'd be concerned about is air leakage outside of the filter material & whether there's multiple layers of filter material with one acting as a humidity/particle protector (which is how surgical masks are constructed)."

[3/3]

@brainwane @0x09 Thanks! This is helpful. For now, I'll probably just stick with my beloved 3M Aura N95s, but if I have a student who identifies to me as needing accommodations around lip reading, this is a great option.

@brainwane @hydropsyche +1 thank you, these sound really legit (for their use-case)

@brainwane @0x09 @hydropsyche Yeah, I've been using these fairly often for about six months.

Not the biggest clear panel, but pretty good. Breathability is surprisingly decent, and I find them pretty comfortable for all-day use. Some fogging (and a tendency for the bottom edge to get damp after a while if so), but not enough that I've found it a problem.

Disposable, which is a mixed blessing; price isn't too bad for N95.

I like 'em, and would recommend trying them out.

@brainwane Thank you for this! I especially appreciate the thoughts about whether or not to try to protect the greater public when they clearly aren't trying to protect themselves.