social.coop is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Fediverse instance for people interested in cooperative and collective projects. If you are interested in joining our community, please apply at https://join.social.coop/registration-form.html.

Administered by:

Server stats:

489
active users

#covid

117 posts100 participants9 posts today

📗 "Viral Modernism: The Influenza Pandemic and Interwar Literature" by Elizabeth Outka

Have you wondered too: why is covid barely visible in modern media? Why do I never pick up a book with someone wearing a mask, even though it's 2020 in the story? Why do I watch tv shows set in 2021 and they act like everything is fine? I have to dig deep for any text that dares to mention the unmentionable (ongoing) SARSCoV2 pandemic, and that really bothers me.

Turns out this is not a rare phenomenon. The same happened after Spanish Flu a full century ago. This book from 2019 digs into the why of it, and then goes on to analyze the presence of the 1918 pandemic in the very few books that did mention it.

The book is divided into three parts. Part 1 zooms in on 'why?'. Why was the flu silenced in literature? Why was it such a taboo? Even if you're not interested in reading the rest of this book, this part is worth it if you've been wondering the same. It has some interesting theories. Partly the war overshadowed the pandemic. But partly it's also a problem of a lack of language and narrative. War is easy to explain: us, the goodies, fight a 'them', the baddies, and someone wins. But a virus is invisible and not well-understood. The 'enemy' doesn't invade from the outside, but spreads throughout your loved ones, penetrates your body and blurs all the lines of who's what. There was a lot of guilt about participation and ignorance. On top of the grief, there's a societal view of sickness as weakness, and of caring and ill health with femininity, which didn't help. I won't recap all of the book here, but it was a fascinating read to see why the pandemic was hidden in media, and how so much can be applied to the current times too. Plus there were lots of archival pictures that I'd never seen before!

In part 2 several books from around that era are discussed and the role of the pandemic in the story is analyzed. I was afraid that it might be too academic for me, but it was quite readable. Most notably I've gotten a more negative view of Virginia Woolf. Although she was one of the few acknowledging sickness in her literature, she also minimized Spanish Flu in daily life, not wanting to engage with it. I was also surprised to see 'look to windward' appear, which I've only known as a quote on war through Bank's books. And wow, the amount of 'living dead' analogies that pop up, interesting stuff.

Part 3 goes into two major trends that became popular post-pandemic: spiritualism and zombie tales. Both are forms of the dead coming back, one for mourning and peace of mind, the other for an outlet for fear and anger. I got quite upset reading about seances where ghosts of flu victims return to earth to exonerate their families from guilt of infection, hmpf. Either way, I thought it was engrossing. In hindsight, it all makes sense, and it helps me understand the way people behave now.

At the end the book states that we're not ready for a new pandemic, although we could be, if only we'd look reality in the eyes and prepare well. Covid started and... here we are. Millions dead, many more millions chronically ill, ableism abound, covid still around and mutating. And probably more pandemics coming at us in the near future. Every day I feel stronger about not letting this truth go unsaid. It's uncomfortable, but more tragedies will occur if the majority of people keep avoiding unpleasant realities. Don't look away, don't underestimate yourself -you can bear it and do your part to keep the people around you safe and well.

As the book says: "Reading the letters and stories told by the survivors of the pandemic —and the literary representations that simultaneously revealed and hid these very stories— launch us into new narrative streams, allowing us to hear voices long ignored in part because the viral, dust-like form at the heart of the story was itself invisible and silent."

I'm adding this book under #PlagueBook and I've also gone back and tagged all previous books that talk about pandemics that I've reviewed with that too (in a tiny effort to not lose these works into silence once again). You can view them all here:

c.im/@reading_recluse/tagged/P

Please stay safe and #WearAMask !

"#Russia Dismisses Claims Of Blood-Coughing Mystery Virus, Cites Common Respiratory Infections"

ndtv.com/world-news/russia-dis

Russian #health authorities are probably right, it's probably a common ailment that happens seasonally

The thing is, we can't trust #authoritarian regimes. Look how the govt of #China covered up the initial #COVID outbreak

And now, in the #USA, we can't trust anything the authorities say either, as #Trump and his band of morons gut the govt health agencies we rely on

cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/trump- The cancellation of $11.4 billion in grants awarded during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, is the latest in a series of funding cuts at federal health agencies by the Trump administration. The funds were being used by states to support COVID testing & vaccination, as well as to put more trained community health workers in communities that have been most affected by COVID-19 and an effort to address COVID-19 health disparities. #COVID #GOP #Health

CIDRAPTrump administration axes COVID funding for state, community health departments

But NYT leaves out a frequently left out point. Ivermectin and covid is *not* just random. There *is* a basis: Parasites can be a comorbidity for covid, in which case treating the parasite infection does help covid survival. But only if there is a parasite infection.

Not knowing this ignorant. On both sides.

——

Free link:

"NYTimes: What Ivermectin Can (and Can’t)" nytimes.com/2025/03/31/well/iv

Many doctors expressed alarm at the idea of patients taking ivermectin, an anti-parasitic drug, for unproven purposes.
The New York Times · What Ivermectin Can (and Can’t) DoBy Dani Blum
Replied in thread

@DenisCOVIDinfoguy they also cite pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/358102

which has this absolute adjective of a hypothesis:

SARS-CoV-2 may bind to ACE2 in order to enter the host brainstem cell and change baroreflex sensitivity

because

The integral parts of the brain renin-angiotensin system, as ACE2 enzyme, are highly expressed in the brainstem, which may also be involved in baroreflex sensitivity, playing an important role in HRV.

which would help explain POTS!!

PubMedPotential autonomic nervous system dysfunction in COVID-19 patients detected by heart rate variability is a sign of SARS-CoV-2 neurotropic features - PubMedIncreasing evidence strongly support that the newly identified severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) leads to the development of COVID-19-associated central nervous system (CNS) manifestations. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral protein in the brainstem, which includes cardiovas …