We need to be critical with toxicological safety levels.
Apart from the ovious political fight and influence by lobbies, there are way too few large-scale toxicological studies that assess multiple toxics, interactions with lifestyle, toxicity of degradation products and long-term effects on human health (reproductive health, endocrine disruptors, gut microbiome etc...) and the environment (yeah, complex topic, I know. But maybe a little bit of cautionary principle?).
We are filling ourselves with toxic shit just because some funds manager can report higher benefits to the already obscenely rich shareholders.
[that said, it's obviously an embarrassment for the authors of the study, but shit happens. I fully agree with their take that the overall conclusions remain: "an order of magnitude lower" sounds like "bah, in reality that's nothing", but the plastic kitchen utensils are by far the only source of toxic contamintants. And the highlighting of the recycling pathway for the pollution of household products is correct. Since we are luckily starting to recycle more stuff, we have to face this problem. And yes, there is also the topic of toxic shit in packaging of foodstuff: https://unwrappedproject.org/recycled-content-in-food-packaging-toxic-chemical-exposure]
@troublewithwords @matthewtoad43
@dlakelan