social.coop is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Fediverse instance for people interested in cooperative and collective projects. If you are interested in joining our community, please apply at https://join.social.coop/registration-form.html.

Administered by:

Server stats:

482
active users

#anthropogenicnoise

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@Shanmonster

Thank you, Shantell!

You and I are some of the few people who are sensitive to these things, it appears.

paper.wf/penumbrage/clean-gree

The Environmental Protection Agency needs to step in and regulate sound, light, and air pollution in a big way.

Let's keep bringing up this issue, and communicating the main points to get people to feel this concern and join in.

penumbrage · Clean, Green, Serene VibeProblem: The peaceful vibe of our towns is disturbed daily by loud landscaping tools - leafblowers, weed whackers, lawnmowers etc. Leaf...
#Earth#Nature#EPA

How #NoisePollution from humans is wreaking havoc on U.S. #wildlife

Nation Jul 18, 2017 2:20 PM EDT

"As transportation networks expand and urban areas grow, noise from sources such as vehicle engines is spreading into remote places. Human-caused noise has consequences for wildlife, entire #ecosystems and people. It reduces the ability to hear natural sounds, which can mean the difference between life and death for many animals, and degrade the calming effect that we feel when we spend time in wild places."

pbs.org/newshour/nation/noise-

#biodiversity #GorhamConnector #SaveSmilingHillFarm #SaveRedBrook #SaveTheForest #WorkingFarms #MaineTurnpikeAuthority #Sprawl #InducedDevelopment #GorhamSpur #Wetlands #Meadows #EnvironmentalImpact
#SaveTheWoods #Maine #GorhamMaine #ScarboroughMaine #WestbrookMaine #AnthropogenicNoise

PBS NewsHour · How noise pollution from humans is wreaking havoc on U.S. wildlifeHuman-caused noise has consequences for wildlife, entire ecosystems and people. It reduces the ability to hear natural sounds, which can mean the difference between life and death for many animals.

Wildlife struggle in an increasingly noisy world

by William F. Laurance
September 21, 2015

"We live on an ever more-populous planet, pulsating with human-generated noises of every description. The most ubiquitous noise-making structures we produce are #traffic-laden roads (Fig. 1), which already criss-cross much of the Earth and are projected to increase in length by some 25 million km by midcentury: enough to encircle the planet more than 600 times. For wildlife, the challenges of living in a world increasingly swamped by such infrastructures are only going to worsen.

[...] "The notion that road noises can disrupt the foraging behavior of birds was bolstered by a laboratory experiment on white-crowned sparrows, one of the more common migrators that suffered lower body condition near the phantom road. In the laboratory, birds exposed to increasingly intense road noises (55 and 61 dB) spent progressively more time being vigilant (raising their heads and looking around) and less time feeding than did birds without road noise (32 dB). Moreover, the authors (9) found no evidence that the sparrows habituated to simulated road noises, suggesting that learning to ignore certain noises is too risky a strategy when one is migrating through a potentially predator-rich environment. Other conceivable explanations for the authors’ findings (such as a possible reduction in insect prey in noisy places) seem less compelling, given that they found that both fruit- and insect-eating birds were negatively affected by road noise.

"The phantom-road study by Ware et al. (9) suggests that the rapidly expanding footprint of roads and other infrastructure across the planet might be invisibly degrading habitat quality for #NoiseSensitive species. Notably, there is no reason to presume that these findings would be confined only to conventional road systems. For example, might sensitive marine species, such as #echolocating cetaceans and migratory fish, avoid noisy regions, such as high-volume #ShippingLanes or areas where #NavalVessels regularly pierce the oceans with high-intensity sonar? Could #echolocating bats be distressed by roaring #airplanes or even by the steady whine of #WindFarms or other infrastructure? For that matter, might even hiking trails frequented by quiet ecotourists or researchers reduce local wildlife activity, as has been observed in protected areas in California and Sumatra, Indonesia?

"Another intriguing possibility is that species that use #lowfrequency #infrasound for long-distance communication—such as #elephants and #cassowaries —might be especially vulnerable to road noises. Low-frequency sounds travel further than do those at higher frequencies and are less likely to be blocked by vegetation and other obstacles.

"For species that use infrasound, the halo effects around roads could potentially be enormous in extent. This seems broadly consistent with the observation that bird species that produce low-frequency calls show stronger avoidance of roads than do those that call at higher frequencies.

"Despite the intriguing implications of the Ware et al. study, it is apparent that vehicle noise is not the only thing that can induce wildlife to avoid roads. In the Amazon rainforest, for example, even narrow dirt roads with very little traffic (<five vehicle passes per day) can markedly reduce the local abundance (17) and road-crossing movements (18) of some understory bird species. Even more dramatically, wider clearings (∼200 m), such as those typical of major #highways, can completely halt the movements of strongly #forest-dependent species, preventing experimentally translocated birds from returning to their territories and lifelong mates."

pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1516

I'm planning on submitting a summary of these studies as part of my arguments against the #GorhamSpur. I grew up near a 4-lane highway, and the vibrations and noise pollution were constant -- I hadn't realized how bad it was until I went back home a few years ago and camped in my old backyard -- and felt every speeding tractor trailer truck going by.

Evidence of the impact of noise pollution on biodiversity: a systematic map

By Romain Sordello, Ophélie Ratel, Frédérique Flamerie De Lachapelle, Clément Leger, Alexis Dambry & Sylvie Vanpeene

Environmental Evidence volume 9, Article number: 20 (2020)

"Ecological research now deals increasingly with the effects of #NoisePollution on #biodiversity. Indeed, many studies have shown the impacts of #AnthropogenicNoise and concluded that it is potentially a threat to the persistence of many species. The present work is a systematic map of the evidence of the impacts of all anthropogenic noises (industrial, urban, transportation, etc.) on biodiversity. This report describes the mapping process and the evidence base with summary figures and tables presenting the characteristics of the selected articles."

environmentalevidencejournal.b

#SaveSmilingHillFarm #SaveRedBrook #SaveTheForest #WorkingFarms #MaineTurnpikeAuthority #Sprawl #InducedDevelopment #GorhamSpur
#Wetlands #Meadows #EnvironmentalImpact
#SaveTheWoods #Maine #GorhamMaine #ScarboroughMaine #WestbrookMaine #RapidTransit

BioMed CentralEvidence of the impact of noise pollution on biodiversity: a systematic map - Environmental EvidenceBackground Ecological research now deals increasingly with the effects of noise pollution on biodiversity. Indeed, many studies have shown the impacts of anthropogenic noise and concluded that it is potentially a threat to the persistence of many species. The present work is a systematic map of the evidence of the impacts of all anthropogenic noises (industrial, urban, transportation, etc.) on biodiversity. This report describes the mapping process and the evidence base with summary figures and tables presenting the characteristics of the selected articles. Methods The method used was published in an a priori protocol. Searches included peer-reviewed and grey literature published in English and French. Two online databases were searched using English terms and search consistency was assessed with a test list. Supplementary searches were also performed (using search engines, a call for literature and searching relevant reviews). Articles were screened through three stages (titles, abstracts, full-texts). No geographical restrictions were applied. The subject population included all wild species (plants and animals excluding humans) and ecosystems. Exposures comprised all types of man-made sounds in terrestrial and aquatic media, including all contexts and sound origins (spontaneous or recorded sounds, in situ or laboratory studies, etc.). All relevant outcomes were considered (space use, reproduction, communication, etc.). Then, for each article selected after full-text screening, metadata were extracted on key variables of interest (species, types of sound, outcomes, etc.). Review findings Our main result is a database that includes all retrieved literature on the impacts of anthropogenic noise on species and ecosystems, coded with several markers (sources of noise, species concerned, types of impacts, etc.). Our search produced more than 29,000 articles and 1794 were selected after the three screening stages (1340 studies (i.e. primary research), 379 reviews, 16 meta-analyses). Some articles (n = 19) are written in French and all others are in English. This database is available as an additional file of this report. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge. It can be used for primary research by identifying knowledge gaps or in view of further analysis, such as systematic reviews. It can also be helpful for scientists and researchers as well as for practitioners, such as managers of transportation infrastructure. Conclusion The systematic map reveals that the impacts of anthropogenic noises on species and ecosystems have been researched for many years. In particular, some taxonomic groups (mammals, birds, fishes), types of noise (transportation, industrial, abstract) and outcomes (behavioural, biophysiological, communication) have been studied more than others. Conversely, less knowledge is available on certain species (amphibians, reptiles, invertebrates), noises (recreational, military, urban) and impacts (space use, reproduction, ecosystems). The map does not assess the impacts of anthropogenic noise, but it can be the starting point for more thorough synthesis of evidence. After a critical appraisal, the included reviews and meta-analyses could be exploited, if reliable, to transfer the already synthesized knowledge into operational decisions to reduce noise pollution and protect biodiversity.