social.coop is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Fediverse instance for people interested in cooperative and collective projects. If you are interested in joining our community, please apply at https://join.social.coop/registration-form.html.

Administered by:

Server stats:

489
active users

#authoritarianism

83 posts57 participants1 post today

If you have kids, like I have a 14yr old, how do you talk about the global situation with them?

My kid is not watching news at all and is oblivious to the situation. They don't live with me, so we have little time to talk. They face more than one oppressive component in their life and I struggle to determine what I can do or educate them on to make them better prepared, resilient and radicalised without traumatising or harming them.

I would appreciate your advice, from whoever parent reads this.

"If you’re part of an organization that builds trust across class, you’re fighting #Trumpism. If you’re a #Democrat jettisoning insular faculty-lounge #progressivism in favor of a Whig-like working-class abundance agenda, you’re fighting Trumpism. If you are standing up for a moral code of tolerance and pluralism that can hold #America together, you’re fighting Trumpism."

#democracy
#authoritarianism
#trump

theatlantic.com/magazine/archi

The Atlantic · David Brooks: I Should Have Seen This ComingBy David Brooks

What if 2025 echoes 1937 more than we’d like to admit?
Economic disparity. Rising authoritarianism. A world on edge.
I’ve drawn some hard parallels—uncomfortable, but necessary to confront.
History doesn’t repeat exactly… but it often rhymes.

🔗 many-roads.com/2025/04/03/geop

Examples of WW2 Eastern European Destruction
ManyRoads · Geopolitical and Socioeconomic Parallels Between 2025 and 1937A Global Historical Crossroads Introduction The geopolitical and socioeconomic landscapes of 2025 bear striking similarities to those of 1937, a period marked by economic instability, aggressive expansionist policies, and ideological extremism. The years leading to World War II were defined by rising authoritarianism, economic contraction due to policy missteps, and the failure of international institutions to curb escalating tensions. Today, despite the presence of modern global institutions and economic safeguards, the echoes of 1937 remain potent. While Western narratives often frame this comparison through a Eurocentric lens, Asia’s historical and contemporary experiences reveal equally critical insights. From anti-colonial struggles in the 1930s to today’s U.S.-China rivalry, Asia has been both a battleground and a catalyst for global change. Understanding these historical parallels across multiple regions provides crucial insights into the risks and challenges of our time. I. Geopolitical Multipolarity and Territorial Ambitions Global Context of the 1930s The late 1930s saw the erosion of the fragile peace established after World War I. Japan’s full-scale invasion of China in 1937 signified an open challenge to the existing world order. Meanwhile, Nazi Germany, emboldened by its remilitarization of the Rhineland in 1936 and appeasement policies from Western powers, pressured neighboring states and prepared for further expansion. Italy’s invasion of Ethiopia in 1935 and its involvement in the Spanish Civil War further demonstrated the global shift toward unchecked aggression.1 Asian Dynamics of the 1930s Asia in the 1930s was a theater of collapsing empires and anti-colonial resistance. Japan’s invasion of China aimed to displace Western colonial powers (Britain in Hong Kong, France in Indochina) and establish a “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere.” Meanwhile, anti-colonial movements fractured European hegemony: Global Landscape in 2025 In 2025, the world has returned to a multipolar structure dominated by the United States and China, with significant roles played by the European Union, India, and Russia.2 China’s assertive stance in the South China Sea, Russia’s ongoing conflict in Ukraine, and territorial disputes in the Arctic reflect a growing willingness among major powers to challenge international norms. The weakening of the United Nations and declining trust in multilateral frameworks parallel the ineffectiveness of the League of Nations in the 1930s.3 Additionally, much like Germany’s aggressive rearmament in the 1930s, nations today are increasing military expenditures at an alarming rate. NATO members have raised defense budgets, China has accelerated naval expansion, and regional powers such as Japan and India are revising long-standing security doctrines.4 If diplomatic engagements fail to manage these rivalries, the risk of conflict escalation remains high. Asian Geopolitics in 2025 Today, Asia is the epicenter of 21st-century power struggles: Unlike 1930s Japan, modern powers use institutional influence (e.g., China in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization) and debt diplomacy rather than territorial conquest, representing a key distinction between the two eras. II. Economic Policy Missteps and Trade Fragmentation Global Economy in the 1930s The global economy of the late 1930s suffered from protectionism, monetary tightening, and weakened financial institutions. The U.S. Federal Reserve’s decision to double bank reserve requirements in 1937 led to a contraction of credit, causing industrial production to plummet by 32%.5 Meanwhile, fiscal austerity measures worsened economic conditions, just as Smoot-Hawley tariffs had earlier exacerbated global trade tensions. These policies deepened the recession and contributed to economic nationalism. Asia’s Colonial Economies in the 1930s The Great Depression devastated Asia’s export-dependent, colonized economies: Global Economic Landscape in 2025 In 2025, monetary policy tightening in response to inflation mirrors the errors of 1937. The Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes, alongside similar actions by the European Central Bank and Bank of England, have slowed economic growth and raised borrowing costs.6 Furthermore, the rise of protectionist trade policies, such as new U.S. tariffs on Chinese and European goods, has increased global trade barriers to levels not seen since the 1930s.7 Supply chain disruptions, exacerbated by geopolitical rivalries and reshoring efforts, further fragment the global economy. The lessons of 1937 suggest that excessive monetary contraction combined with trade restrictions could lead to a prolonged economic downturn. One key difference between the two eras is the role of technology. While automation and artificial intelligence drive productivity, they also create anxieties over job displacement. This economic uncertainty fuels populist discontent, much like the industrial layoffs and labor unrest of the Great Depression.8 Policymakers must carefully balance technological progress with economic stability to prevent social unrest. Asia’s Economic Strategies in 2025 Asia navigates a fractured global order with greater agency than in the 1930s: New forms of economic dependency have emerged: III. Social Polarization and Ideological Extremism Global Ideological Landscape of the 1930s The rise of extremist ideologies in the 1930s was driven by economic hardship and political instability. The Great Depression eroded faith in democratic institutions, allowing authoritarian leaders to gain support by offering radical solutions. By 1937, fascism had cemented its grip in Germany, Italy, and Japan, while communist and ultranationalist movements gained traction in Spain and Eastern Europe.9 Asian Ideological Movements in the 1930s Asia’s ideological battles centered on anti-colonialism: Global Polarization in 2025 Today’s ideological polarization has led to a decline in trust in democratic governance, with populist and nationalist movements gaining momentum across Europe, the United States, and parts of Asia.10 Unlike the 1930s, modern democracies have stronger institutions and welfare programs that cushion economic shocks. However, political disinformation, social media-driven radicalization, and attacks on democratic norms pose significant threats.11 The parallels with 1937 underscore the importance of reinforcing democratic resilience against emerging forms of extremism. Asian Sociopolitical Developments in 2025 Modern Asia grapples with democratic erosion and dissent: Digital technologies have created new dynamics for both state control and resistance. Social media empowers state censorship (China’s Great Firewall) while simultaneously enabling dissent movements (Myanmar’s Spring Revolution). IV. Contemporary Challenges: Climate Change and Demographics Climate Vulnerability Unlike the 1930s, today’s world faces unprecedented environmental challenges. Asia bears 75% of global climate disaster displacements. Bangladesh’s sea-level rise threatens 35 million people, while Pakistan’s 2022 floods caused $30 billion in losses.24 These environmental pressures create new sources of instability not present in the 1937 comparison. Demographic Divides Demographic shifts represent another modern challenge without historical parallel. Japan and South Korea’s aging populations (median age 49) contrast with India’s youth bulge (median age 28). China’s population decline (the first since 1961) risks economic stagnation and creates new geopolitical pressures.25 V. Lessons and Projections History demonstrates that economic mismanagement, unchecked geopolitical aggression, and ideological extremism can have catastrophic consequences. While technological advancements and international institutions provide safeguards against a repeat of the 1930s, complacency remains dangerous. Global Imperatives Policymakers must prioritize diplomatic engagement to mitigate conflicts, avoid protectionist economic measures that could deepen global instability, and address the root causes of social polarization. A failure to heed these lessons risks repeating the mistakes of 1937—leading to outcomes that the world cannot afford. Asian-Centered Future Pathways Conclusion The parallels between 2025 and 1937 are evident across both Western and Asian contexts, though with important distinctions. While the West focuses on great power competition and economic protectionism, Asia’s experience highlights both colonial legacies and emerging agency in the international system. Unlike the 1930s, today’s global challenges include climate change and demographic shifts alongside traditional security and economic concerns. By understanding both Western and Asian perspectives on these historical parallels, policymakers can develop more comprehensive strategies to avoid repeating past mistakes. Asia is not merely a passive arena for great power conflict but a dynamic architect of global order. The integration of these perspectives offers the best chance to navigate the crossroads of 2025 without descending into the catastrophic outcomes that followed 1937. Notes 1 Richard Overy, The Origins of the Second World War (New York: Longman, 1998), 76-78. ? 2 “Global Power Dynamics Report,” NATO, last modified March 15, 2025, https://www.nato.int. ? 3 Susan Pedersen, The Guardians: The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 312. ? 4 “Defense Spending Trends 2025,” SIPRI, https://www.sipri.org. ? 5 Robert F. Bruner, “Liveblogging the Great Depression: Comparison with the Great Recession,” Darden Blogs, December 15, 2016. ? 6 U.S. Federal Reserve Board, Monetary Policy Report (Washington, DC: FRB, 2025), 12. ? 7 U.S. International Trade Commission, Economic Impact of Tariffs (Washington, DC: USITC, 2025), 45. ? 8 David Autor et al., “The Labor Market Impact of Artificial Intelligence,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, March 2024. ? 9 Stanley G. Payne, A History of Fascism, 1914–1945 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1995), 310-312. ? 10 Pippa Norris and Ronald Inglehart, Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019), 214. ? 11 “The Future of Democracy Report,” Freedom House, 2025, https://freedomhouse.org. ? 14 Pankaj Mishra, From the Ruins of Empire (2012). ? 15 2023 U.S. DoD China Military Power Report. ? 16 C. Raja Mohan, India’s Strategic Choices (2023). ? 17 “ASEAN Centrality in the Indo-Pacific,” ISEAS, 2024. ? 18 Ken’ichi Ohno, Japanese Economic Development (2018). ? 19 “India’s Defense Modernization,” SIPRI, 2023. ? 20 “RCEP and Trade Fragmentation,” Brookings, 2023. ? 21 “Japan’s Stagnation,” IMF, 2023. ? 22 Rana Mitter, China’s War with Japan (2013). ? 23 “Asia’s Democratic Backsliding,” V-Dem, 2023. ? 24 IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, 2023. ? 25 UN DESA Population Division, 2023. ? 26 Utsa Patnaik, The Agrarian Question (2021). ?
Continued thread

The full DC Circuit in a 7-4 decision set aside a 3-judge panel's March ruling that paused lower court decisions blocking Trump from removing Gwynne Wilcox from the National #Labor Relations Board #NLRB & Cathy Harris from the #Merit Systems Protection Board #MSPB.

Monday's decision puts back in place 2 judges' decisions that upheld federal laws barring #Trump from removing members of the labor boards at will.

A federal appeals court blocked #Trump from removing #Democratic members from 2 federal #labor boards on Monday, setting aside its earlier ruling.

The decision by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit further complicates a pair of cases that are emerging as key tests of Trump's efforts to bring under his control #FederalAgencies meant to be #independent from the White House.

#law #labor #AbuseOfPower #tyranny #autocracy #authoritarianism
reuters.com/world/us/us-appeal

@ruthbenghiat Ben-Ghiat: "The speed and scale of what's happening in this country doesn't have a parallel even in the early months of the autocrats we know and do not love today ... this is somebody in partnership with Putin."

youtu.be/TXH8Mcd0RjM?si=DgqxkR

@KimberlyEAtkins

youtu.be- YouTubeEnjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Baiting Democrats into a defence of fancy colleges would further pigeonhole them as the party of the wealthy and credentialed. The failure of university presidents to speak up for one another—with such honourable exceptions as Mr Eisgruber—is making each more vulnerable.
#fascism #education #universities #USpolitics #authoritarianism #Trumpism
economist.com/united-states/20

cartoon of Donald Trump as a high school jock in a varsity jacket lifts a frail teacher by the collar while holding a baseball bat. A science lab is in disarray with broken beakers, and two students watch in surprise.
The Economist · Donald Trump is attacking what made American universities greatBy The Economist

Growing up in #1990s #Philippines, I can't help but see some weird parallels here in #Australia today...

- Loss of individual liberty
- Widespread government #corruption
- Dumb and negligent #corporations
- Obsession with private school
- Prudish religious culture
- Public feel helpless to change
- #Authoritarianism by default
- #Wealth determines your #worth as a person
- Massive and growing wealth inequality

What happened here in #Oz? We used to be the lucky country.

Now we're just a #mess.

After a forced tech break, DemocraTrend returns—louder, sharper, and more committed than ever to dissecting the authoritarian creep in our politics and culture.
📅 New deep dives on Wednesdays
🗣️ Dispatches on Thursdays
First post drops 4/9:
Join the fight for democracy:
🔗 open.substack.com/pub/carlosrm
#Democracy #PopCulturePolitics #Authoritarianism #SubstackWriters #DemocraTrend

DemocraTrend · We’re Back. Let’s Get Loud.By Carlos Raul Muñoz Jr.
Continued thread

"Think about what this means. If you’re Donald Trump (along with Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller), and you’re considering defying the courts, 'disappearing' political opponents, or even invoking the Insurrection Act and declaring martial law, you now know that there is an active, fired-up, massive resistance ready to meet your actions."

~ Jay Kuo

#HandsOff #protests #Trump #authoritarianism #resistance #solidarity
/10

statuskuo.substack.com/p/thoug

The Status Kuo · Thoughts on the Sunday AfterBy Jay Kuo
Continued thread

"No mention of the protests on the cover of the NY Times (NO MENTION!), below the fold on WaPo, nothing on MSNBC.com. CNN shows protesting Houthis but not protesting Americans. So, those of us with platforms and those of us with friends or family need to be spreading the word."

~ Stephanie G. Wilson

To say I expected corporate media to behave this way would be an understatement.

#HandsOff #protests #Trump #authoritarianism #resistance #solidarity #media
/9

freedomoverfascism.us/p/lexing

Freedom Over Fascism · How it was: 1775 Battle of Lexington Shot Heard Round the World. How it's going: #Handsoff to Trump Regime 2025By Stephanie G Wilson, PhD