Here is an interesting thought to post to a mastodon instance. From Dmytri Kleiner via P2P Foundation:

"Going back to an early Internet architecture of cooperative, decentralized servers, as projects such as Diaspora, GNU Social, and others are attempting to do, will not work. This is precisely the sort of architecture that anti-disintermediation was designed to defeat. Decentralized systems need to be designed to be counter-anti-disintermediationist."

@wu_lee he is right, but not for the reasons he provides. The problem is that platforms like Diaspora, GNU Social, Mastodon etc... all rely on ISPs to exist. Kleiner's idea of "[platforms] run[ning] on the computers of the platform’s users" won't solve a thing: ISPs can still lock people the fuck out of the internet as they please. Cooperatively owned ISPs are the only long-term solution to the anti-disintermediation problem.

@Antanicus: do you mean "ISP" as in a "internet connection provider" (like AOL, BT, Virgin Media) rather than "hosting service" (like whatever runs

So agreed, as but both can be counter-d15n'ed, wouldn't full anti-counter-d15n of the *gateways* (as I think you mean) require a mesh network, because the telco infrastructure is private and c-d15n'able?

> do you mean "ISP" as in a "internet connection provider" (like AOL, BT, Virgin Media) rather than "hosting service" (like whatever runs
-Yes, ISP stands for "internet service provider". Some of those also offer hosting services too, but that's not relevant.

- the telco infrastructure is private and c-d15n'able? That's why we need to overtake it and cooperatively own it. Local telcos need be the main target for this

@Antanicus @wu_lee alas there was even a point in Britain (late 19th/early 20th century where many telcos *were* locally owned (albeit by the Council) if not private companies; but because they *wouldn't* federate the Govt nationalised them into the Post Office and (as political views changed) later privatised as British Telecom, with the exception of Hull in Northern England. This remained in Council ownership until quite recently when the *citizens* of Hull *voted* to let it be privatised.


@Antanicus @wu_lee

Secure Scuttlebutt is aiming to be run on user hardware only. And to be connection/communication method agnostic.

So is a possible mechanism to counter this.


Another somewhat as proposed here

"goTenna" is a smart-phone based mesh network. The speaker asks at the "Blockchain Summit" how to create an incentive for users to run nodes.

@Antanicus @vfrmedia

I was wondering if could be a potential means to incent users to run mesh network nodes (it already has a model for running hosting space). You get credit for hosting.

@vfrmedia @Antanicus @alanz

@wu_lee @alanz @vfrmedia there is no need for gimmicky incentive schemes under cooperative ownership: all members share the financial burden and those who do the actual work get paid for it out of the cooperative common fund.

@Antanicus @wu_lee @alanz

indeed. I am cynical about anything mentioning "blockchain", same with "devops" or all other buzzwords common in tech.

existing co-op ownership model *works* and has worked since 1880s and even survives in ruthlessly competitive environments such as retail.

I often get cycling jackets and winter gear online from a workers co-op in Scotland/North of England (folk there more likely to ride in winter so they sell better items than competitors in the South!)

@vfrmedia Agreed, and Cynicism++

Nevertheless, here we are on social media :) Also, see comments about limitations of coops here

Holochain may be a gimmick, but it is not a blockchain, as the authors are cynics of that too. I hope it could be a tool *for creating* co-op propsperity.

@Antanicus @alanz

@wu_lee @alanz @vfrmedia Camille better get her shit together because "cooperativism is an economic project without any associated political project" is possibly the biggest pile of steaming shit I EVER came across on any social media...


Not the point I meant.


It says otherwise successful co-ops can be undermined by global/free market forces.

Therefore if you advocate co-ops (and I, & I believe Camille and the authors do), and the article is correct, you need a way to counter that "system problem" to really "survive ruthelessly competetive environments like retail".

@vfrmedia @alanz

@wu_lee @alanz @vfrmedia the "system problem" is real, but if they can't see the deep political implications of the movement I doubt they will ever solve it. This piece by Commons Transition, on the contrary, gets it right from the very title

@Antanicus, The authors of the article are from the Next System Project and I believe they are on the same page more or less as the Commons Transition, Bauwens' P2PF, CIC etc.

So yes, they are looking precisely at the deep political implications of the co-op movement - or rather, a larger movement thereof based around "the commons".

@vfrmedia @alanz

I have been involved in coops for 20 years and have mentors who've been involved in coops since the 70s. I struggle to point to examples of coops being forces for broader radical sociopolitical *systemic* change. I'm all ears/eyes if you know of any. But effecting sociopolitical change is not some thing that is "baked" into the cooperative structure and that is why I call for an accompanying explicitly political project.
@Antanicus @vfrmedia @alanz

Well, if taking power away from the capitalist elite and effectively seizing the means of production isn't a "baked in" political trait of coops, then I don't know what a cooperative is... One might argue coops lack a political presence in the traditional sense (ie. A party) but that's further proof of the deeply political message of coops: to hell with the failed representative democracy, let's get things in our hands.
@wu_lee @vfrmedia @alanz

My point is that the lion's share of cooperatives in the world would not describe themselves this way. I believe the majority of the world's cooperatives are, indeed, capitalist and pro-capitalist. I don't have data at hand, but I welcome it and am enjoying this debate immensely.
@wu_lee @vfrmedia @alanz

@kavbojka @Antanicus @wu_lee @vfrmedia @alanz I think this is very likely true. But that's at least partly because they can't imagine organizations that compete more or less successfully in the market as anything but capitalist. To most people, market=capitalism.

@Steve @alanz @vfrmedia @wu_lee @kavbojka
>can't imagine organizations that compete more or less successfully in the market as anything but capitalist
-that's the whole point of capitalism: to create a framework so strict and oppressive in nature (but called "free market" because you know, marketing...) that literally nothing can thrive or even exist outside of it

@Antanicus @Steve @alanz @vfrmedia @wu_lee @kavbojka

I became very interested in Community Supported Agriculture, there are many forms, but they all create a different economic relationship between a person & their food.

In some German CSAs members build a list of what produce they want, the growers calculate cost of production then members make secret pledges of the amount they will contribute, if not enough they reconsider produce to grow and/or have a second round of pledging and so on.

I used to be part of the local CSA. The farmers were lovely but the city part of it was/is the height of bourgeois white gentrifer nonsense. I think CSAs as part of a more fully realized solidarity economy have potential but I think most CSAs are elitist crap.
@Antanicus @Steve @alanz @vfrmedia @wu_lee

@kavbojka @dazinism @Antanicus @Steve @alanz @wu_lee

although the core people running the one in our town *are* fairly middle class (they had the resources to retire from high paying tech jobs) I certainly wouldn't class the wider segment town it feeds as "gentrified" (this isn't such as thing in Ipswich as its not a big city like London). Also our town is divided up by the river and road networks so ideally where should be a CSA in SW section (where I live) as well as East

@vfrmedia @wu_lee @alanz @Steve @Antanicus @dazinism @kavbojka I recently learned that American tend to be rooted in a Rudolf Steiner model, while most Canadian CSAs are derived from a model developed independently Japan. This is an interesting overview:

I'm part of one that is owned as a consumer co-op by the subscribers, of which there are only 2 I know of in the US:

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!