I feel like instead of decrying all content recommendation systems as evil spyware, we should work on ethical alternatives.
@noemi This is what I'm in favor for.
@noemi Wut? Making things instead of just sitting here, criticizing? ARE U MAD? 😬
@noemi I've been researching approaches to privacy-preserving distributed recommendations, but I haven't got the math quite right yet. I'm pretty sure it's possible to get the benefits of "algorithms" for content recommendations without actually sharing anyone's private data with anyone else though. As a first step, I wrote up some of the related research recently: https://jamey.thesharps.us/2018/07/10/private-secure-multiparty-histograms/
I think it's exactly the right model, where the actual recommendations are computed locally at the user's request. But I also think it's complementary to what I'm trying to do, which is to give people a safe way to publish aggregate statistical data about "people who like this also like that", which would be useful input to something like Ultra Gleeper.
Zack, you have given me an opportunity to mention the liveblogging parody at https://www.crummy.com/2005/02/12/0#comments which is hilarious, but also retroactively melancholy because it's by Aaron Swartz.
social.coop is a cooperatively-run corner of the Fediverse. The instance is democratically governed by its members, who generally share an interest in the co-op model, but topics of discussion range widely.
Our instance is supported by sliding scale contributions of $1-10/mo made via Open Collective. You must have an active Open Collective account to apply for membership; you may set one up here