I feel like instead of decrying all content recommendation systems as evil spyware, we should work on ethical alternatives.
@noemi This is what I'm in favor for.
@noemi Wut? Making things instead of just sitting here, criticizing? ARE U MAD? 😬
@noemi I've been researching approaches to privacy-preserving distributed recommendations, but I haven't got the math quite right yet. I'm pretty sure it's possible to get the benefits of "algorithms" for content recommendations without actually sharing anyone's private data with anyone else though. As a first step, I wrote up some of the related research recently: https://jamey.thesharps.us/2018/07/10/private-secure-multiparty-histograms/
I think it's exactly the right model, where the actual recommendations are computed locally at the user's request. But I also think it's complementary to what I'm trying to do, which is to give people a safe way to publish aggregate statistical data about "people who like this also like that", which would be useful input to something like Ultra Gleeper.
Zack, you have given me an opportunity to mention the liveblogging parody at https://www.crummy.com/2005/02/12/0#comments which is hilarious, but also retroactively melancholy because it's by Aaron Swartz.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!