Following on my recent musings about performance management and judgement vs metrics, I wonder out loud: Why Do We Have “Performance Evaluations”, Anyway?
@anaulin I've probably avoided positions where someone might performance evaluate me.
Though would love more of: "supporting someone to grow in the ways that fit them best"
I've been pondering a way to distribute money in a team and maybe the same idea applies to evaluations: workers themselves tend to know who is up to what, so if everyone did score voting about everyone else, might quickly work it out p2p style.
Might not work without generally transparent/open personal dynamics though.
I was working in a small team earlier this year. We agreed at the beginning to discuss at the end how to split the funds we were getting to carry out the work.
We all know each other pretty well.
The process was new for us all and wasnt very smooth.
I think that having a bit more of a chat early on about how the money was going to be split may have helped.
We all agreed on a division at the end and are all still friends.
Making discussions like these are what I think makes social coop brilliant.
Hopefully we can develop Social Coop into a 24/7 "helpline" for coops around the world to ask for similar advice and support.
@dazinism @anaulin I haven't really experienced this in a paid work context, but I have been in volunteer collectives (including shared houses) where we assumed we could 'cross that bridge when we get to it', because we all knew each other well. I think it's always better to work it out beforehand, especially anything involving money or assets. Agreeing on conflict resolution processes at the start is helpful too. Friendships take less strain that way ;-)
social.coop is a a coop-run corner of the fediverse, a cooperative and transparent approach to operating a social platform. We are currently closed to new memberships while we improve our internal processes and policies, and plan to re-open to new folks when that work is complete. [9/2/2018]