We should view protocols as the digital means of production, more so than platforms. And that ‘protocol cooperatives’ will do more to break down capitalism than platform coops will. think the main argument being that platform coops are inherently centralised, and that as far as challenging capital goes, we should be striving for decentralised architectures.

· brutaldon · 3 · 17 · 22

I think the argument being we should have coops that interoperate on top of a shared protocol; not one coop that dominates an entire market with a platform.

Relates somewhat to the Statebook article (, which argued that the state would serve us better if it focused on building and promoting shared protocols, not on building a Facebook alternative.

@neil A statebook would be the worst of all worlds.

What's needed are decentralized systems which are run by users, not by corporations or the state. Like guifinet.


Bottom up decentralization is the way to change things.

The historical model is vegetable gardening.

Current projects include living off the grid, municipal internet, and the fediverse.

Sign in to participate in the conversation is a coop-run corner of the fediverse, a cooperative and transparent approach to operating a social platform. We are currently closed to new memberships while we improve our internal processes and policies, and plan to re-open to new folks when that work is complete. [9/2/2018]