Do we really need a StateBook?

The conclusion, with which I would agree, is: no. It would be centralised services just of another kind.

Good though to see a major political party recognising that the centralisation of the social graph with the big digital giants is not a good thing.

But a better solution is the support of open standards and protocols, and control and portability of data.

@neil Sadly, this is the direction that the traditional left in Europe heading, either oblivious to the fact (or cognisant of it and trusting that for some unique reason they themselves cannot be corrupted) that they are creating yet another centralised silo. What gets overlooked is the potential of a third way – a model with people who have individual sovereignty at the heart of a decentralised topology that then forms the necessary substrate for a healthy commons.

Sign in to participate in the conversation is a cooperatively-run corner of the Fediverse. The instance is democratically governed by its members, who generally share an interest in the co-op model, but topics of discussion range widely.

If you are interested in joining our community, please review our Bylaws and Code of Conduct. If you agree with them, you may apply for membership on our instance via this link

Our instance is supported by sliding scale contributions of $1-10/mo made via Open Collective. You must have an active Open Collective account to apply for membership; you may set one up here