my blueprint for liberatory digital for science & academia is up on arxiv, i'll write a thread on it when i get a chance, but for now here it is for my fedi friends. with lessons from and the fediverse, making this happen will be the project for the rest of my foreseeable future :)

an abstract that does not Fuck Around
(image repeated to fit it all in alt text)

yes it is the one that will be the main document/have the most current version:)

well there will never not be a free version at the URL linked on the first page. gol darn it I didn't know about nc

I tend to overlook copyright because it is fake and I always endorse just um "stealing" shit but it always bites me in the ass

@jonny I understand but Elsevier was created by bulk-buying copyright from scholars who couldn't be bothered, so we must really avoid a repeat with any new initiative.

yeah definitely good to know. it sort of wouldn't really apply in a lot of this because it's mostly p2p but yes definitely need to make an update. is it ok if I cite you/your toot/that page?

"it's mostly p2p" meaning no platform so most circumstances that necessitate rights transfers wouldn't be there but definitely need to add a footnote or a section about copyright

[[Elsevier]] [[Copyright]] [[Creative Commons]]

I had a quick look (at summary not paper) and feel uneasy that p2p linked data is yr architectural foundation. I note that much of the practice of knowing comprises storying & stories of stories. Also a lot of mapmaking sharing and following. Not being concerned with 'science' but with rigorous practices of knowing and capability making makes the S-practice just a local-historical fashion? And while anything can be rendered as data, eatable by digital mills, surely it ain't foundational?

My own instinct says practices like Alexander pattern language(ing) - which incorporate pieces of community-story within a more formal-patterned matrix - are a way to go. Not least, bcos they are intrinsically community practices. Doesn't mean they're not p2p. But does mean they're not essentially individual. A vision of individually owned data seems bleak to me, if architectures of community and historical story are not providing an infrastructure for THAT infrastructure?

keep reading then because I am thinking of linked data less as data and more as a means of realizing vernacular expression, and systems for building them together in overlapping and fluid social systems is the idea :)

'Vernacular' is a good commitment :)

Although . . 'rigorous' matters equally. And might be harder to grasp.

One more for luck: pluriversal. I don't like these polysyllables! But think: opposite of modernist globalist colonial 'universal' - plural, respected, well founded, mutualised worlds and narratives.

Skimming . . I come across Leigh Star as a source on 'infrastructure(ing)'. Good place to go to ;-)
"Infrastructure becomes manifest when it breaks down."

Equally, infrastructuring-by-design is a characteristic hubristic commitment of post-Fordist capitalism: impossible (bcos infrastructure is ecolology, evolving in-place, in relationship) but obsessively attempted.

if ya get around to it would love to hear any thoughts that come up :)

@jonny I'm only a few chapters in, but I have to say this is really magnificent. I'd love to pick your brains about it when it's done, as it covers a lot of territory I've been thinking about for many years (since Aaron Swartz was killed, basically).

I think you'll find your proposals have a lot of overlap with the general approach to science me and my coeditors adopt in our new magazine's manifesto:

I am flattered, and yes taking a read now and I love it. I'll be starting to organize some groups across domains to work together after a bit of a break and will definitely be reaching out. there is much to do to unfuck the world

and also yes feel free to pick away whenever

@jonny Oh you absolutely shouldn't feel flattered, I'm an innumerate poetry nerd with some crazy friends who threw together a little magazine like everybody else and their uncle in Brooklyn; whereas your proposal is extremely precise, erudite, technically sophisticated, and widely read across a number of important literatures concerning the history and infrastructure of the Internet and the philosophy and history of science. If anything, the honor is mine!

Sign in to participate in the conversation

A Fediverse instance for people interested in cooperative and collective projects.