On academic writing, and NOT academic... one of Chekhov's earliest works. Letter to a Learned Neighbour. (in English here): https://nyrbclassics.tumblr.com/post/124187160647/young-chekhov pub. 1880
about social.coop purpose and values
I've added some comments about ''purpose'' to the code of conduct etherpad. This is a parallel from UK business law... capitalist enterprises are no longer required to say what their purposes are. (since the Companies Act 2006) Before 2006 it was enough to write "do any business, and anything necessary to run that business, in the interests of shareholders".
I found this document by @mike_hales in the p2p foundation wiki entry for social.coop https://loomio-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/files/000/152/026/original/mh_2018_07_01_-_reading_group_notes.pdf ... I can see the overall logic, but I'd love to see all these references and ideas spread out and explained in a wiki, or maybe discussed again in office hour/community cafe.
Norwegian Forum for English for Academic Purposes - NFEAP - https://uni.oslomet.no/nfeap/ online from Oslo Metropolitan University
Starting today .https://www.thecn.com/6797773 language for specific purposes mooc part of the ERASMUS+ catapult project
When context overwhelms everything: Where is the space for research in the midst of "the great onlining"? https://feeldothink.org/2020/04/27/ed-tech-research-in-the-great-onlining/
proudly wearing seven badges:
the digiTeacher on "autonomy tours in the classroom" https://digiteacher.wordpress.com/2018/06/19/autonomy-tours-in-the-classroom/
a blog post about the same occasional paper
Legitimation Code – what is “abstract”?
Karl Maton speaking to BALEAP in 2017 isn't satisfied with the term "abstract". Semantic Gravity goes from weak at the top - for things that depend less on context for their meaning (the process of photosynthesis), down through general groups of things (flowering plants without woody stems) to strong gravity at the bottom where the meaning is highly linked to a part
The foreword to "De la misère symbolique" contains footnotes to Deleuze, but it begins by stating that it is a continuation of an analysis in « Aimer, s’aimer, nous aimer ».
I think this is enough to identify Stiegler's starting point as located in the "Sovereign" part of the autonomy plane. This means that the writer has high positional autonomy: he's talking about ideas which he has alr