I feel like the majority of people care that much about decentralization. But I also think they don't care that much about centralization.
Often whatever comes first and works is what gets ingrained.
Contrast: if some big corp came along and tried to centralize email, people would (hopefully?) tell them to eff off. But, trying to decentralize microblogging is a big effort because Twitter was there first.
Let's get there first with things then, I guess.
@deejoe @neil this is what I'm most worried about for the fediverse. federation is useless if it's a federated oligopoly. and when I point this out to people, the usual (but extremely frustrating) response is 'well just don't let it get that centralized then, man.'
while I agree, how does anyone actually plan on doing that? cause we're up against the two most powerful centralizing structural forces in human history - the accumulation of capital, and the network effect.
We need counteranti-disintermediation. I guess there's various routes? education (make people aware of the perils of one company running everything); politics (legislation against monopoly of core services); tech (favour p2p rather than server-based?); direct action (don't know how you would do that against google.)
Big job though.
@deejoe @neil yes, absolutely!!federation can be a crazy powerful tool to use to fight centralization when used purposefully. however, individual effort is not enough - we must build out the fediverse in a way that automatically, systematically and structurally resists the centralizing tendencies of both capital and the network.
how do we design the fediverse so that it's impossible for its degree of decentralization to do anything besides monotonically increase over time?
A Fediverse instance for people interested in cooperative and collective projects.