It is strange that in (at least american) society there is so much variety in expression in every art form and yet there is one glaring conservative bastion. Stories CANNOT be fundamentally ambigious. They must have a clear plot, and almost everything that happens must be in service to that plot. I think it has to do with clinging to the newtonian understanding of the universe, that if you had enough information you could theoretically understand EVERYTHING from one perspective.

Follow

@Alonealastalovedalongthe "Stories CANNOT be fundamentally ambigious." -- except for, well, the whole strand of fiction where ambiguitiy's not a problem: Barthelme, Coover, Dick, (Jane) Bowles, Acker, Barth, Saunders, etc. It's not as broad a vein as various genre categories but it's pretty deep?

@fncll I don't know all of those authors but of the ones I know, they definitely write in a deeply ambigious framework. I think that the fact that you can say that this is a narrow genre of stories, and not the vast landscape surrounding the peculiar towns of Definite Narrative and Definite Characters is telling of the fact that the meaning of these stories hasn't absorbed into culture.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
social.coop

social.coop is a cooperatively-run corner of the Fediverse. The instance is democratically governed by its members, who generally share an interest in the co-op model, but topics of discussion range widely.

If you are interested in joining our community, please review our Bylaws and Code of Conduct. If you agree with them, you may apply for membership on our instance via this link

Our instance is supported by sliding scale contributions of $1-10/mo made via Open Collective. You must have an active Open Collective account to apply for membership; you may set one up here