by creating a face-saving way to endorse outgroup opinions this image has contributed more to the practice of rationality than the entirety of lesswrong
@flancian it would be really interesting if as much actual serious attention were paid new social phenomena that *advance* civil discourse among average people as is paid to... well
@maya oh, that would be interesting indeed :)
It is my dream with the Agora, although of course I'm limited in skills and time.
Even without a fully working Agora I think we can already discuss the guidelines/values/contexts that would maximize the chances that civil discourse happens, in particular around interesting topics.
@maya I've thought of game-like activities in which a platform chooses two willing people to have a conversation in such a way to maximize the chances that one of them will change their mind on a given position. For this you'd need to know A and B's world models -- which could be inferred from volunteered personal databases. One algorithm that seems promising is: choose two people who overlap in >95% of their opinions/values, yet differ in a key topic.
@maya I'm also interested in the simplest [[contract]] that would give the greatest benefit to a community. So far I've settled on:
- follow the principle of charity
- try to increase mutual understanding over winning discussions
- try forgive mistakes if people said sorry and made amends
@maya wdyt? what would a system that increases the quality of civil discourse look like to you, if you want to share?
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!