"At DMOZ's inception, there was little thought given to the idea of how DMOZ should be managed and there were no official forums, guidelines or FAQs. In essence, DMOZ began as a free for all."

It seems like an interesting case study in managing a commons.

Later: "DMOZ staff began to give trusted senior editors additional editing privileges, including the ability to approve new editor applications, which eventually led to a stratified hierarchy of duties and privileges (...), with DMOZ's paid staff having the final say (...)"

@flancian Yeah I'm actually a big fan of structure and order. I think anarchists are stereotyped as chaotic. the ironic thing is actual anarchism needs lots of responsibility to work
Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!