Friend Camp has about 50 active users and I just noticed we have more than half a million posts here since August 2018! I mean that's 11 a day per person on average but still. That seems wild to me.
Last I checked something like 75% of our posts are unfederated. That's still 125 thousand posts sent to the fediverse. I think local-only posting increases the vitality of community, increasing the volume of overall activity, and contributing more to the fediverse than a less vital instance would.
@darius I'm intrigued by this idea, and a big believer in the positive effects of interacting in small(er) community groups.
In real-life community is everywhere, and ppl + communities interact in a complex social fabric.
I feel community might be better expressed online, and for a while I'm posting about a "Community has no Boundary" paradigm.
On SocialHub I mention an AS/AP vocab extension on top of Group + Actor.
Would be great to have your input on the topic.
One thing to consider is whether communities explicitly defined allow for taking the concept next-level on the fediverse.
Now it is mostly implicit i.e. instance boundary, discourse forum, etc.
An explicit definition as a domain model, allows modeling things on top of that when needed, such as Membership + Roles, or Governance.
( @hamishcampbell started talk on the latter which - if federated - would require a meta-model AP extension to define policies. See https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/what-would-a-fediverse-governance-body-look-like/1497/51 )
@humanetech @hamishcampbell This is all very much of interest to me. Are you aware of my "neighborhoods" work? (It's not a formal proposal because I'd rather build it first, see how it works in practice, and then make a proposal)
@celia @darius I think it is https://runyourown.social/ ?
@celia @darius oh yeah, you're right! I thought it could be the hometown docs too, but I don't see it there https://github.com/hometown-fork/hometown
@edsu That's what I thought too -- but the text there is different.
@darius