Recent searches
Search options
The above thread on the US CDC and guidelines on the most recent COVID boosters is public, and boosts are welcome.
Note again that tomorrow (Sept 8, 2023) is the deadline to post public comments in advance of the ACIP meeting.
I don't know a whole lot about the internals of how public comments are processed by U.S. agencies, but my understanding is that specificity and technical knowledge adds real weight to a public comment. If you have domain-specific expertise, it really helps if you can show it.
This impression is based on guidelines I heard at a Union of Concerned Scientists meeting years ago, and is also reflected in the "Commenter's Checklist" available on the official comment page.
Some quotes from the Commenter's Checklist:
"A comment can express simple support or dissent for a regulatory action. However, a constructive, information-rich comment that clearly communicates and supports its claims is more likely to have an impact on regulatory decision making."
and
"Base your justification on sound reasoning, scientific evidence, and/or how you will be impacted."
Another quote from the "Commenter's Checklist":
"Identify credentials and experience that may distinguish your comments from others. If you are commenting in an area in which you have relevant personal or professional experience (i.e., scientist, attorney, fisherman, businessman, etc.) say so."
Note also that there is no maximum or minimum length for public comments to the U.S. government.