Clicked around on our Loomio page, and what the Tech WG is publishing is fascinating. The level of professionalism and openness is commendable.
@nornagon I might start posting them myself.
There was an effort to maintain an official account, but the WG responsible for it  is dead and is not listed in the WG list .
Disclaimer: I'm a noob and might be missing something.
Hi @deltaidea Last July I picked up this WG. Then meltdown happened
Michele (original group coord) left, I suspended posting till dust cleared.
Tech and ctty WGs/ops teams are working hard now, becoming systematic. Yes their actions and insights should be posted somewhere visible. Ctty WG ops team is on the case, wiki & git being used routinely now to publish @mattcropp
I had a scheme for internal research/development/publishing via Editorial WG
barely started work on this b4 meltdown. Intention was public review of S-C’s means processes & intentions/visions. As distinct from routine reporting of official actions. Which also was/is getting attention.
@mattcropp @nornagon @Matt_Noyes @emi
3 of 3
I’m now snowed with non S-C stuff
unlikely to spend time developing Ed WG 😞
I’m currently ‘at large’ in Ctty Ops Team WG. This link w EdWG needs to be strong
But EdWG needs to be active too. Scheme still important I think. Intention to be reflective about aims and processes is alive in WGs.
Somebody/ies wanting to pick this up in Ed WG? Good 😀
@mattcropp @nornagon @Matt_Noyes @emi @wu_lee @LeoSammallahti @alanz @TheScienceRobot
@deltaidea Complex stuff, time consuming . . and plenty of history. Take your time :)
social.coop is a cooperatively-run corner of the Fediverse. The instance is democratically governed by its members, who generally share an interest in the co-op model, but topics of discussion range widely.
Our instance is supported by sliding scale contributions of $1-10/mo made via Open Collective. You must have an active Open Collective account to apply for membership; you may set one up here