Clicked around on our Loomio page, and what the Tech WG is publishing is fascinating. The level of professionalism and openness is commendable.

@deltaidea do you know if these meetings/minutes are published on the instance anywhere? would be nice to see links to the minutes in my feed when they're posted! @mattcropp maybe?

@nornagon I might start posting them myself.

There was an effort to maintain an official account, but the WG responsible for it [1] is dead and is not listed in the WG list [2].

Disclaimer: I'm a noob and might be missing something.


@nornagon @mike_hales Mike, we're talking about the Editorial group here, and you seem to be mentioned there (see [1] above). Could you tell us more?

Hi @deltaidea Last July I picked up this WG. Then meltdown happened
Michele (original group coord) left, I suspended posting till dust cleared.

Tech and ctty WGs/ops teams are working hard now, becoming systematic. Yes their actions and insights should be posted somewhere visible. Ctty WG ops team is on the case, wiki & git being used routinely now to publish @mattcropp

I had a scheme for internal research/development/publishing via Editorial WG
barely started work on this b4 meltdown. Intention was public review of S-C’s means processes & intentions/visions. As distinct from routine reporting of official actions. Which also was/is getting attention.
@mattcropp @nornagon @Matt_Noyes @emi

3 of 3
I’m now snowed with non S-C stuff
unlikely to spend time developing Ed WG 😞

I’m currently ‘at large’ in Ctty Ops Team WG. This link w EdWG needs to be strong
But EdWG needs to be active too. Scheme still important I think. Intention to be reflective about aims and processes is alive in WGs.
Somebody/ies wanting to pick this up in Ed WG? Good 😀
@mattcropp @nornagon @Matt_Noyes @emi @wu_lee @LeoSammallahti @alanz @TheScienceRobot

This is all very interesting, need time to form an opinion.

@deltaidea Complex stuff, time consuming . . and plenty of history. Take your time :)

Sign in to participate in the conversation is a cooperatively-run corner of the Fediverse. The instance is democratically governed by its members, who generally share an interest in the co-op model, but topics of discussion range widely.

If you are interested in joining our community, please review our Bylaws and Code of Conduct. If you agree with them, you may apply for membership on our instance via this link

Our instance is supported by sliding scale contributions of $1-10/mo made via Open Collective. You must have an active Open Collective account to apply for membership; you may set one up here