@KevinMarks @strypey @cwebber

What would a partnership of indieweb and activitypub look like? Can they play nicely together? Or would they fight?

@bhaugen @KevinMarks @cwebber the main difference is that #IndieWeb (as I understand it) is designed around the idea of everyone having a self-hosted homepage, which implements a bunch of simple-as-possible protocols, allowing those homepages to form a social network. Obviously quite different from the assumptions behind AP (a federation of servers, each with one or more users, each with a web or native client) or #SSB (a #P2P network of native clients that may have intermittent net access)

@strypey @bhaugen @KevinMarks @cwebber Not an expert but I don't think it's *necessarily* (although very common) about being self-hosted, it's about owning your identity and your data. e.g. micro.blog provides hosted services that adhere to indieweb protocols (and principles).

In some ways its closer to Hubzilla than Mastodon, IMO.

The reason I mention that (and hope I'm correct in saying so) is that I think it's vital that indieweb does not expect everyone will self-host.

@neil @bhaugen @KevinMarks @cwebber I could be wrong, but the indie.web always struck me as a very 'by developers, for developers' approach. Everything I've read about it, including all the stuff on their site, seems to be aimed at people who understand protocols and how to implement them.

@strypey @neil @bhaugen @KevinMarks I'm not really interested in "by developers, for developers", because my target is not "liberate developers", it is "liberate everyone"

@cwebber @neil @bhaugen @KevinMarks yeah, with all due respect to the IndieWeb folks, it kind of reminds me of those people who are super passionate about growing their own organic veges, or knitting cardigans, or restoring old cars, and don't seem to grasp that this is much harder and less appealing for other people than it is for them. Also that for some people, it's as achievable as performing your own brain surgery.

@neil @cwebber @bhaugen @KevinMarks this is some really good strategic thinking. But is still assumes that the end of goal is 'everyone is a commune of 1'. To me, projects like #RiseUp, #FramaSoft,#Disroot, and many others demonstrate that its possible to 'own your own data' collectively, as well as individually.

@strypey @neil @cwebber @KevinMarks

The reason we are going with personal ActivityPubs (as well as organizational ActivityPubs) is that an individual (me, for example) can participate and federate with many organizations and other individuals.

Any or all of those could be hosted by cooperatives.

But the structure matches what we see happening around us.

@bhaugen @neil @cwebber @KevinMarks sure, I am in no way opposed to individual instances. But I'm thinking about my Mum as a potential user, or even my brothers and sisters. I just can't imagine a time that they're ever going to be willing to admin their own instance. Some of them don't even admin their own devices, after years of owning computers of various kinds ;)

@strypey @neil @cwebber @KevinMarks

I am also not opposed to multi-person sites. We will have some. And also easy hosting opportunities.

/he says before it has all happened....8-)

@bhaugen Easy hosting - yes please! Definitely part of the vision? Starting now, not in the future! For example, I'm stunned there seems to be no hosting service for Mediawik that doesn't require me to adopt the 'server admin' role - which I absolutely don't have time or priorities or brain cells for. I could really use a wiki. But no way am I going to hack CSS or install modules - no matter how well written the help files are. Life's too short.
@strypey @neil @cwebber @KevinMarks


@mike_hales @strypey @neil @cwebber @KevinMarks

> Easy hosting - yes please! Definitely part of the vision?


> Starting now, not in the future!

No. Somebody (probly more than one person) needs to do some work and probly spend some money. But we'll definitely be talking to the various hosting cooperatives.

@bhaugen @KevinMarks @cwebber @neil @strypey @mike_hales

Indeed, this is very much needed (for every kind of FOSS that can be self-hosted).

I tried doing a bit of that with https://cloudvault.me a while ago (giving full admin control, but also helping with setup and tech support, with the labour decoupled from infrastructure costs).

Also hoped to do this more collectively as part of social.coop, and then through discussions with webarchitects.coop

Keen to see and potentially participate in a new initiative...

@mayel Slight tangent . . I'm experimenting (tentatively) with browser & pages written in in a repo shared over as a basis for a website hosted on my own laptop boosted via platform host. Far fewer features than Mediawiki - unless somone arranges a beaker hackathon? But maybe a regime like this is within the limited scope of a 'non-admin' user? The P2P capability might offset fewer bells & whistles?
@bhaugen @KevinMarks @cwebber @neil @strypey

@mike_hales @mayel @KevinMarks @cwebber @neil @strypey

Wow, Mike, you are bolder than me! I haven't played with beaker and dat yet. But the people who developed that stuff used to work on scuttlebutt so I know them from there as really great devs and helpful friendly people.

@bhaugen It actually seems easier to me this way :D I know how to write markdown the browser is a clean writing/file-management environment (very familiar to folks in the git world?). So, the prospect of being part of leading-edge P2P exploration feels very low risk. Risk will get a whole lot higher, when I stop tinkering, invest a load of content into a website, and start sharing! One step at a time . .
@mayel @KevinMarks @cwebber @neil @strypey

@bhaugen Are the devs in mastodon? I might have a couple of embarrassingly naive questions to ask.

That actually sounds like a really good solution @mike_hales . Is it accessible only by people using #BeakerBrowser themselves, or from a normal web browser also? If so, what's the URL?
@mayel @bhaugen @KevinMarks @cwebber @neil

Beaker-published dat websites can present with an http domain name, in normal browsers. Firefox, as of recently, half-recognises dat protocol but AFAIK prompts viewing in beaker, if installed. Not sure yet. But I think that's as far as integration goes. Anyone out there understand this more fully?

Time to call on @taravancil
Please clarify for us Tara?
@mayel @bhaugen @KevinMarks @cwebber @neil

@strypey There is a dat-fox plugin for Firefox. But it requires a helper to be installed from github, which is beyond my capabilities or patience (command lines? you have to be joking). So . . Beaker it is.
@taravancil @mayel @bhaugen @KevinMarks @cwebber @neil

Sign in to participate in the conversation

A Fediverse instance for people interested in cooperative and collective projects.