A rebuttal of the above article, pointing out that it is based on outdated data, and that it misses the system view of the problem: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/nov/26/yes-electric-vehicles-really-are-better-than-fossil-fuel-burners
@anaulin I am wondering about the battery components. Isn’t it very dirty to recycle and dispose of EV batteries? Has that technology improved? ... Also, I never see the qualitative comparison between the point sources of pollution of individual dispersed oil-based vehicles with the pollution from power plants that produce the dirty energy charging vehicles. Assuming the quantity of pollutants were the same, dispersed pollution might be more problematic.
@CaitlinWaddick The rebuttal article claims that battery energy has gotten less dirty in recent years, and they also get recycled.
Taking a step back, it seems to me that we are likely to continue making progress in both having cleaner energy mixes, and improving manufacturing and recycling. So pushing for more EVs seems, from a system point of view, the better strategy: an EV you buy today will get "cleaner" as energy mix, recycling, etc, improves, while a combustion engine will stay dirty.
social.coop is a cooperatively-run corner of the Fediverse. The instance is democratically governed by its members, who generally share an interest in the co-op model, but topics of discussion range widely.
Our instance is supported by sliding scale contributions of $1-10/mo made via Open Collective. You must have an active Open Collective account to apply for membership; you may set one up here