I'd like to learn more for sure. I'm always a bit skeptical when people are like "THIS structure will FIX your PROBLEMS!" especially after trying a couple different governance structures in college student groups... you can spend SO much time talking about group structure and not really get anywhere.
On the other hand, it seems like a lot of people have had some really good experiences with Sociocracy, especially when it comes to time/burnout saving, which is kind of the holy grail of organizational structure.
I'm especially interested in the history of how it came to be, and what sets it apart from other systems (ex: what's between consensus and consent?)
@ntnsndr @aral @tbeckett @samtoland @mattcropp @douginamug @aaron Yes. And sociocracy and holacracy are close. Here is one important difference between the two, and that's the ownership model. Holacracy® is a registered trademark. Sociocracy is open. A world of a difference to me. https://www.holacracy.org/trademark (To be precise, the "sociocratic circle method SCM", a set of norms, is not but that's irrelevant. Sociocracy for the basic principles is free. Anyone can offer services and call it that.)
Consent: "a decision is made when there is no objection"
Consensus: "A decision is made when everyone agrees"
Consensus can be used like consent; when "I agree" means something like "I see this is good enough".
We favor a slightly more clear definition, plus we teach how to move forward from an objection, instead of it being a roadblock.
It's subtle but consent is embedded in a bigger approach of "fail fast and often!"
@aaron @douginamug @mattcropp @ntnsndr @samtoland @tbeckett @aral The history in 400 something characters.... Quaker-inspired school (Boeke in the NL) runs school on consent . A former student (Endenburg also in the NL) inherits a electrotechnics company from his sociocalist parents and applies and refines what he saw in decision-making at the school he was at. He adds cybernetics (feedback loops, continuous learning and improving). He writes a bookin hte 80ies. It spreads from there.
True. That puts us as mission-driven sociocracy promotors in a funny spot. One the one hand, I want to say "its' important that you tweak it and make it your own", but on the other hand, I'd rather just have people use it "out of the box" because most tweaks I have seen brought issues through the backdoot that users were not aware of. So we often say "start with the standard, refine later."
social.coop is a cooperatively-run corner of the Fediverse. The instance is democratically governed by its members, who generally share an interest in the co-op model, but topics of discussion range widely.
Our instance is supported by sliding scale contributions of $1-10/mo made via Open Collective. You must have an active Open Collective account to apply for membership; you may set one up here