Worried about the dominance of big instances? No, really, this is quite natural.
As an emergent and self-governing system, it could be expected that the size distribution of #Mastodon instances roughly follows Zipf's law.
At first you see the top 6 instances, and then the rest. But on a log-log scale the size distribution is close to a straight line, which would be expected from an emergent system.
@Stoori If I may ask, why is an emergent system expected to follow Zipf's law?
@kdsch Ok, I'll take a step back and say that I do not in any way claim it to be a universal law. Because I'm not into philosophical musings about statistical distributions right now.
It's just so that many emergent systems *do* follow that kind of distribution, so it's reasonable to assume that any new emergent system *may also* behave similarly. And in this case the data supports the assumption.
@Stoori That's fine. I was just curious why you would expect that; I find it very interesting, and this was the first time I heard the idea. I'm not really a stats person, but I have read about emergence.
@marcelovmaciel @kdsch Of course, it boils down to the fact that people can choose their instance freely. If there was a mechanism to assign people randomly to different instances, the distribution would be totally different.
It will be interesting to look at the stats a year from now (etc.) and see if the s factor (in a sense a measure of concentration) stays stable or changes notably.
social.coop is a cooperatively-run corner of the Fediverse. The instance is democratically governed by its members, who generally share an interest in the co-op model, but topics of discussion range widely.
Our instance is supported by sliding scale contributions of $1-10/mo made via Open Collective. You must have an active Open Collective account to apply for membership; you may set one up here