Today in the quiet co-op consensus: David Brooks talking up worker ownership for the gig economy. https://nyti.ms/2DaRdGA
@ntnsndr As David Brooks would do so. “Shopping for a worker co-op would be more like buying a gym membership.” Uhhhh.
@tbeckett @ntnsndr Because, I guess, from Brooks' point of view it is people like him who have a responsibility to do right by the rest of us. As opposed to involving the working poor in governance, he simply wants the educated class to do a better job listening to their needs....and apparently neither Brooks nor his editors at the Times can tell how offensive this is to those of us who are actually working-class and poor.
"...train and retrain workers as they moved from firm to firm..."?!? I mean, WTF is he even talking about? A worker co-op that "represents workers in negotiations..."? Pretty sure that's not how union co-ops work, bro. Might want to talk to Collective Copies or something...
Other weird things: first he bemoans "alternative work arrangements" with their lack of stability and security, but later on he throws shade on the "old, adversarial" union model for being "inappropriate for the gig economy." Um...make up your mind, David.
@tbeckett @ntnsndr "We in the college-educated sliver have built a culture, an economy and a political system that are all about ourselves." But this is all wrong. What about the struggling adjunct professors, or all the college educated construction workers I know, building houses for $12/hour? Is the economy all about them? Hardly.
social.coop is a cooperatively-run corner of the Fediverse. The instance is democratically governed by its members, who generally share an interest in the co-op model, but topics of discussion range widely.
Our instance is supported by sliding scale contributions of $1-10/mo made via Open Collective. You must have an active Open Collective account to apply for membership; you may set one up here